KPIs that drive change – How to measure sustainability in tourism
The long-term preservation of economic, environmental, and social systems is becoming increasingly critical, prompting the development of guidelines for responsible tourism management.
Striving for sustainability in tourism is an admirable goal—but how can we truly determine whether a destination is sustainable, and to what extent? How do we measure the impact of our efforts? Both public policy and private initiatives depend on robust data to understand the scale of the challenges, identify root causes, raise awareness, and ultimately assess the effectiveness of implemented measures.
In search of the most effective impact KPIs: A shared KPI framework for destinations
There is already a long history of proposals, studies, guidelines, and indicator frameworks for tourism. We build on these insights and combine them with our own practical experience. Our goal is to develop a pragmatic proposal—fully aware that identifying a single set of indicators suitable for all contexts is a challenge. We want to avoid burdensome, time-intensive data collection processes that fail to deliver tangible improvements in destinations, as well as the accumulation of unnecessary data. Our focus is on creating a practical, actionable framework that drives real change on the ground, rather than producing purely theoretical concepts. We rely on a collaborative process that harnesses the creativity and collective intelligence of all stakeholders involved.
The role of KPIs
We recognize that measuring sustainability performance is essential for improving management and enabling successful transformation. At the same time, we do not believe in a “magic KPI effect,” where simply introducing indicators automatically leads to meaningful progress. A study by Dr. Gloria Crabolu on destinations applying the European Tourism Indicator System offers a sobering insight: only 8% were able to demonstrate tangible improvements. We need to do better.
Key considerations in the joint development process
Our focus is on developing a concise KPI framework that can be applied across destinations. While not every KPI will be relevant in every context, each destination should select those that best align with its tourism strategy and sustainability objectives.
To ensure comparability between destinations and to drive meaningful improvements, we aim to define a set of 5 to 10 KPIs. These indicators must be relevant, globally applicable, comparable, and easy to measure.
We are fully aware that data collection is often challenging—or, in some cases, not feasible at all. Sustainability indicators frequently suffer from data gaps and limitations in terms of temporal and spatial coverage. It has been shown that infrequently collected, large-scale datasets can hinder the overall evaluation of indicators. Destinations, in particular, struggle to measure complex issues such as environmental impacts or tourism pressure—especially where tourism is dispersed and density varies across regions. This highlights the need for clear data definitions and methodological rigor for each indicator.
Another challenge in defining indicators is securing the motivation and willingness of entities to provide data. Encouraging businesses and destinations to share data is critical. To achieve this, the benefits and purpose of sustainability performance assessment must be communicated clearly and convincingly.
We acknowledge the challenges of data collection. However, this should not be seen as an argument against introducing a KPI framework. We will gather KPIs wherever possible and complement them with a “maturity model.”
We are starting small and keeping it simple—but we are starting. The first version may not be perfect, but it will evolve and improve over time. We see ourselves as a learning system.
Systemic indicators for the holistic nature of destination systems
We have explored in depth how to account for the complex systems within a destination. Even the most carefully designed KPI framework cannot fully capture this complexity. KPIs are inherently linear and one-dimensional. This is why we need an additional tool that integrates qualitative and systemic aspects and reflects real-world impacts. We are currently developing a maturity model inspired by natural systems and cooperative dynamics within ecosystems. More details will be shared in our next newsletter.
Interested in learning more about our shared KPI framework?
Feel free to get in touch. We will be happy to share our current proposal and keep you informed about further developments. We are collecting feedback until mid-November, after which we will publish a KPI framework to be tested in pilot destinations.
We look forward to your input as we work towards solutions with lasting impact.
Contact: Koschwitz@tourcert.org
At a glance
Category
Published on
Reading time
3 Minutes
Share this article:
Tags
KPI for Measuring Sustainability Impact | KPIs für Nachhaltigkeit | KPIs im Tourismus | Nachhaltiger Tourismus | Tourism Impact Alliance | Tourismuskennzahlen | Umweltauswirkungen | Umwelteinfluss | Wirkungsmessung
Do you have any questions?
We’d be happy to discuss our services with you and help you find the solution that best fits your needs. We look forward to hearing from you!
Günter Koschwitz
Partner I Founder